NettetSupreme Court of India Joseph Shine vs Union Of India on 27 September, 2024 Author: . .. 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL … Nettet17. jan. 2024 · Provisions Discussed in Joseph shine v Union of India. Section 198 (2) of The Code of Criminal Procedure – defines that only the husband can be the aggrieved party. Section 479 of the Indian Penal Code – defines punishment for adultery. Article 14 – Right to equality – Adultery only prosecuted men and women and hence, it was …
What time and TV channel is Ulster v Dragons on today in the URC?
Nettet11. apr. 2024 · Joseph Shine, the hotelier challenged the constitutionality of Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code. The core reason behind this petition was to shield Indian men from being punished for extramarital relationships by vengeful women or their husbands. Nettet25. nov. 2024 · In October 2024, Joseph Shine, a non resident Keralite, filed a petition in the Supreme Court of India challenging the constitutionality of Section 497 read with Section 198 (2) 22 of the CrPC. Section 497 used to criminalise the offence of adultery. It provided for the punishment to a man who engaged in sexual intercourse with another … tri u jednoj marinko
The Intermingling of Morality with Criminal Justice: An …
Nettet7. jul. 2024 · Joseph Shine filed a writ petition under A-32 challenging the constitutionality of Section 497 of IPC being violative of Article 14, 15 and 21. He claimed the provision for adultery is arbitrary and discriminatory on the basis of gender. It maligns the dignity of a woman. The constitutional bench of 5 judges was set up to hear the petition. NettetSupreme Court of India Nettet12. sep. 2024 · Case Facts of Joseph Shine v. Union of India. In 2024, Joseph Shine, filed a PIL under Article 32 challenging the constitutional validity of Section 497 of IPC … tri znaka za smak svijeta